Darrell,
Good morning.
I am probably the most obnoxious of those who routinely respond in threads. So read between the lines.
I looked over the thread and followed the give and take.
You have decided to have two dogs. Why you have the dogs, where they came from , how long one has lived with you, etc. makes little difference to me. You have two dogs.
Dogs eat together in my world. Four GSDs. The bowl for each goes down. They are released by name or with a global OK to eat, and they can not go to another dog's bowl. Period. A dog should be able to eat in peace, just as I like to eat in peace without anyone taking food from my plate. Training. The key to a calm and managed meal time is training. It is simple. My food, my bowls, my rules.
Outside. Certain behavior is not tolerated. Emphasis on not tolerated. I am the dominant member of the pack. My wife is the dominant leader of the pack. The same with any human. A dog tries to dominant another, and I immediately correct it. Various tools are collars and leads. A booming voice. No negotiation. The dogs fully compliant with the command NO!
I expect the dogs to get along. I work with my mutts to make cast iron sure they do. I do not in any way shape or manner condone by inconsistent oversight nor do I overlook any behavior I do not want. I correct behavior decisively when necessary. Mostly corrections are voice tone or a touch but
Training, and training corrections are one thing. Correction for unwanted behavior can be another. Sorry if that bugs anyone.
Two dogs: have to be dead even in the pecking order. No dog in my world is above another in the order of the house. Four dogs complying with my rules. And my rules are non negotiable. If you spend a lot of time focusing on one dog or letting the other dog get away with stuff because it has been around longer, you are setting the table for a poor meal.
If there is behavior I don't like it is not uncommon for me to address all the dogs at the same time with an eye to the offender. All the dogs need to be reminded that certain behavior is just not going to happen.
I have found that my way of working with the dogs expedites the integration of foster dogs. They come into the group and I don't care what their background is for the purpose of my rules. I work with dogs in the context that the only leader in their world is me. They don't have to worry about leading or following or getting out of the way. They can be dogs.
Now, I have one or two dogs and have definitely had foster dogs that have been and can be challenges but the rules are the rules are the rules and I get to make them. My rules are designed for a pleasant environment in which I can thoroughly enjoy the dogs. Out of control dogs are not fun.
So. Stop the behavior you don't want. Reward the behavior you do. Don't vary your rules from day to day. Don't let slide stuff today that you corrected for yesterday. Define your objective. Mine is to have harmony in the pack. Takes effort but the outcome is really nice.
In my opinion, you can't train the dogs separately for behavior you want them to exhibit together. So, stuffing one in the crate and indulging the other ain't a good strategy in my opinion. Get two crates. If you want one in the crate put the other one in a crate. Treat them the same. Dogs get it. And I don't use the crate as a penalty box. If they are in a crate, it is for a purpose other than penalty or discipline.
OK. I'll stop. My last admonition is to simply be the leader and reward what you like and correct what you don't like in the context of consistent training.
Mike A.
"I wouldn't touch that dog, son. He don't take to pettin." Hondo, played by John Wayne