I recently got a private email through the board from Chad Stahl. Chad has a PHD (I am not sure what his specialty is) and feels that it is irresponsible to tell people that they should not get yearly vaccinations. Here is his post followed by my thought.
Hi,
I'm a new user of your discussion board and cam across this discussion on vaccination. It is important to realize that there are several different types of vaccines, examples being live (dilute but viable), modified or attenuated (treated in a manner to reduce viability, as well as synthetic. Not all vaccines inject a virus into your animal.
Without going into a detailed description of acquired immunity and individual differences in maintaining immunity, just because an initial series of vaccines is given, does not mean that immunity will persist over the life of the animal.
Is it likely that most animals will lose this immunity in a year? No. Two years? Maybe not. The reason for recommended yearly vaccines is a cost benefit analysis. Data showing negative health effects of yearly vaccination in dogs has not been conclusive. And with the cost of a combo vaccine dose at around $2.50 versus the costs associated if your dog contracts one of these preventable diseases, it is understandable why people err on the side of caution. Recommending that no further vaccination should be given after the original series is irresponsible. I would be happy to discuss this topic further if you wish.
My Thoughts - First I posted this email on the board because I feel it offers another point of view (different from my own)
In my opinion no matter what the science is behind vaccinations ( an I will not try and ague the science because I am not trained in it) I do not agree with Chad.
I think the veterinary industry is running a scam on pet owners. It's called the "YEARLY VACCINATION SCAM TO IMPROVE CASH FLOW." The fact is that the Vet industry is now backing off yearly vaccinations on cats (too many health problems have resulted) Many responsible vets are agreeing with my position.
The most important issue that Vets do not consider is the healthy food factor. By that I mean if we feed our dogs a better diet (not commercial dog food)
http://leerburg.com/diet.htm we will have healthier dogs. If we have healthier dogs our dogs will have the needed antibodies to fight off disease if they come in contact with it. There in lies my biggest argument against all these types of vaccines.
The bottom line is that injecting these vaccines into our dogs has serious side effects on too many dogs. I get emails all the time about serious adverse reactions that happen right after (within a couple of days). What we don't hear about because people don't put tow and two together asre the long term reacions.
In my opinion the average consumer or pet owner should not believe that the companies that make these products are going to offer honest results on their products side effect. If they did I would not be hearing about so many reactions.
Companies play down the dangers. They don't want to talk about increased long-term health problems. Yes the dog survived the vaccination - but did it cause thyroid problems, did they cause cancer in later life, did it cause pancreas problems? Did the allergies that the dogs develop come from too many vaccination? I will error on the side of healthy food and no yearly vaccinations.
I am sorry Chad but I trusted the Veterinary industry for 25 years and I have seen too many medical problems that I didn't used to see. When I start seeing distemper or Lepto in my kennel I will change my opinion but I seriously doubt that this will ever happen.
So on this issue all we can do is agree to disagree.