Hi Guys,
There is not a lot more to be said on this subject that will take us much further down the road but having said that I would like to make the following points.
We have a voluntary and non-profit organisation here, Border Collie Rescue, to cater for abandoned BC's.
I take J Parker's point re the popularity of the breed. We have the same problem, hence the need for BC Rescue.
This list, and others like it, attract subscribers who are "into dogs" so I know that I'm preaching to the converted. One hopes that somebody still learns something. More importantly, that something learned may well be passed on to others who are not so knowledgable.
I read many posts and wonder why that particular individual has chosen that particular breed of dog knowing nothing about the breed, and more worrying, knowing little or nothing of the psychological make up of canis familiaris generally.
Shandar makes the point that ALL breeds have good, bad and indifferent. Quite correct, however, understanding the variables between genetic and environmental conditioning can make an enormous difference to the way a dog turns out.
There are some breeds that are not suitable as house dogs for Mr or Mrs Average whereas that breed may well be an ideal house dog for an experienced handler.
It is my contention that owning a dog should be treated in the same manner as driving a car. The "driver" should be compelled to take a "driving test" and pass that test to a basic standard.
Upgrading from a car (miniature poodle) to a truck (rotti) would need a different licence.
OK, it's not going to happen so let's be realistic.
I notice that some of the more experienced handlers give advice to others using terms that are way over the heads of most people who are asking the question. Then there are others who relate an experience that they have encountered that is unique to them and may, or may not, have any bearing on the issue in question. The end result being that the person who asked the original question has so many diverse opinions that he/she may well be more confused than when they started.
A fundamental answer to 99% of these questions is: "Take yourself and your dog to a dog training school".
If this course of action were recommended, then the query would emanate from at least a basic understanding and hopefully the answers given would be received with a basic understanding.
To illustrate the point. Shandar, who it appears knows something about herding, responds to my post in what appears to be a personal challenge.
If I assume Shandar is knowledgable on the subject then I can assume his response is knowledgable. But the response has no bearing on the question originally asked. It may have content that is useful to somebody interested in taking up herding but I fail to see how it answers the dog aggression issue.
And just to set the record straight for anybody who does not know, and who may believe inherently the points made by Shandar:
The herding instinct/attribute possessed by the herding breeds is not "prey instinct".
Without getting technical and completely off the original concept, prey instinct is a hunting/feeding drive. The herding instinct is anything but. (If anyone would like to challenge this statement please drop me an e-mail. I shall be happy to discuss the issues).
All breeds of dog have prey drive to a greater or lesser degree but how many of those breeds are capable of herding.
Certainly herding instinct could be called a "second cousin", but they are certainly not the same thing.
Now I would like to address the semantics between the terms "nip" and "snap".
At no time did I mention the dog "savaging". The BC will snap (or if you prefer, nip) the hock to move a recalcitrant sheep. Herding dogs do not nip having gone into pressure and being uncomfortable nor do they back off and give more distance because they are uncomfortable.
The sheep must move and be herded to a given point. If the dog fails to "intimidate" the sheep into compliance then the nip/snap does the job.
And the fact that Shandar has seen more damage done to sheep by BC's is hardly surprising. No other breed is involved with this work to the extent that BC's are. That's a bit like saying there are more vehicle accidents in New York than there are in the Alaskan interior!
The fact remains that BC's snap/nip naturally. And they can and do this with people, especially children. On the other hand I personally have never heard of an incident of a BC "savaging" anybody.
I do not recommend this breed as a housedog unless the owner/handler is experienced.
And to balance things out I would make the same reservation (for similar but different reasons) regarding the Dalmatian.
Now what I would like to see from the experienced and proficient people is a small, well written and incisive article on any dog subject you like. Something we can all learn from.
Best regards,
Geoff.