I said: "F1 hybrids also have more "hybrid vigor"."
Originally posted by Elisabeth Barber:
Maybe, but this is not guaranteed.
Of course it's not guaranteed. Nothing that complex genetically can be guaranteed. Two OFA Excellent parents can still produce dysplastics, for example. Odds are they won't, but it can happen.
It's about odds. Studies have confirmed, as one would predict, that odds are mixed breed dogs are healthier ON AVERAGE and live longer than pure breed dogs do ON AVERAGE. It's because of hybrid vigor.
Originally posted by Elisabeth Barber:
A GOOD breeder of purebred dogs is very strict with health clearances.
Then darn few of them are GOOD breeders. Ever seen the stats for the percentage of various pure breeds that are OFA'd? It's about 5% for GSDs. A very small percentage of GSDs bred in America are OFA'd.
Originally posted by Elisabeth Barber:
I'm not saying that some breeders who mix breeds are not responsible, but these are most likely going to be those who are breeding for a purpose.
Breeding for pets is breeding for a purpose. Some will do it carelessly, or for the wrong reasons. Some will do it with care, and produce good companion dogs.
I said: "I find it interesting that some apparently think it's OK for breeders to intentionally breed and sell pure breed dogs for the pet market but it's not OK to intentionally breed and sell mixed breed dogs for the pet market."
Originally posted by Elisabeth Barber: I'm of the belief that at this time there are enough pets produced out of working or show breedings along with more than enough dogs in the shelters to supply the pet market. Why should someone breed solely for pets??? Aren't our shelters and rescues full enough?
IMO, companion dog owners deserve a healthy sound dog just as much as working dog owners do. If someone wants to obtain a dog from a shelter or rescue... great! More power to 'em. I've done both, and will likely do it again. But I know the odds are worse than if I get a pup from a careful breeding program.
If one wants a healthy pup with sound temperament, one is more likely to get it if one can assess the temperament of both parents, and confirm they have health clearances. These things usually aren't possible with shelter or rescue pups. With many shelter pups, one often has no idea even what sort of breeds went into them, therefore little idea what they will be like when grown. The "spaniel mix" pup I got from the SPCA many years ago grew up to have a lot of border collie energy, looks, and even "eye". Who'd have known?
IMO a "pet quality" dog out of show dog breeding is likely to be excessively inbred, and therefore much more likely to be unsound than most other breedings. Also, at least from what I've seen, temperament and health are so far down the list of many show dog breeders' priorities that in many cases I wouldn't take one of their pups if they gave it to me. Lastly, breeding dogs for the purpose of winning beauty pageant shows is not something I will support by giving a breeder who does so any my money.
IMO a "pet quality" dog out of working dog breeding program will often be too much dog for most companion dog owners. You just can't reliably tell at 8 weeks what a dog's drive and temperament will be when they grow up, so assessing them as "pet quality" at that age is iffy. Wanna example? My husband's GSD tied for the high protection score at the recent USA North American SchH3 Championship. This is a strong, high drive dog. "He's a monster!" is what the front half helper said as he left the field at the NAs after working this dog. Yet this dog was the "pet quality" pup out of a working litter. He was deemed at 8 weeks to be "too mellow" to do schutzhund. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> I just love this dog, and wouldn't trade him for anything. But in many companion dog homes, he wouldn't have made it past puberty without being dumped in a shelter.
Laura Sanborn