Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
#179708 - 02/08/2008 03:32 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-08-2007
Posts: 611
Loc: Kansas
Offline |
|
I'm currently in a "friendly" disagreement w/someone on another board, re: beet pulp. I stated that I've read that it's a source of sugar (that dogs do not need), and she keeps insisting it's simply a source of fiber, and does not contain sugar. I quoted "Foods Pets Die For" by Ann Martin, and this poster is saying that this book, and every other source that says this, is mistaken.
So, who is right? I have seen multiple sources that say beet pulp is high in sugar...I'm confused...
P.S. I posted asking her to state her source of info, but haven't heard back yet...
Edited by Kori Bigge (02/08/2008 03:33 PM)
Edit reason: P.S. Added
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Kori Bigge ]
#179718 - 02/08/2008 03:57 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 06-27-2007
Posts: 547
Loc: Orcutt, California
Offline |
|
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Kori Bigge ]
#179798 - 02/09/2008 10:17 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
I'm currently in a "friendly" disagreement w/someone on another board, re: beet pulp. I stated that I've read that it's a source of sugar (that dogs do not need), and she keeps insisting it's simply a source of fiber, and does not contain sugar. I quoted "Foods Pets Die For" by Ann Martin, and this poster is saying that this book, and every other source that says this, is mistaken.
So, who is right? I have seen multiple sources that say beet pulp is high in sugar...I'm confused...
P.S. I posted asking her to state her source of info, but haven't heard back yet...
Well, it's pretty much correct that it does not contain sugar; it's the material left over after the sugar is removed from sugar beets. Modern methods of taking the sugar are very thorough, since the sugar is the product the manufacturer wants. (As Shody says, I'd have to say *most* of the sugar is extracted.)
So beet pulp is a by-product: cheap and available. It's a way to add fiber to highly-processed commercial foods.
Unfortunately, most of the sources you'll find about the uses of this "beneficial" by-product are either directly from Iams or can be traced back to Iams (or Hills/SD) and always (of necessity) involve animals on commercial foods and not fresh foods.
I'm curious, though, about sources that say it's *high* in sugar. Can you link me to an online source?
I don't feed commercial foods, but if I did, then the digestible, simple starches (read sugar) in corn and other cereal grains would be an even bigger problem to me.
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#179806 - 02/09/2008 11:45 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-08-2007
Posts: 611
Loc: Kansas
Offline |
|
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Kori Bigge ]
#179808 - 02/09/2008 12:01 PM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
I went to that third one first and when I "searched" for "beet" got this return:
QUOTE:
She advises to look for meats that are human grade, natural preservatives, whole grains (no “hulls&rdquo , and avoid “beet pulp” which is an artificial stool hardener and high in sugar. ... Weiskopf also advises against raw food diets. She says that cooked grains and vegetables are an essential part of a pet’s diet. END
I'm no defender of commercial ingredients, and certainly not manufacturing by-products, but I don't know if I'd invest a lot of time in that source.
I'll do some reading later and let you know what I find.
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#179809 - 02/09/2008 12:04 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-08-2007
Posts: 611
Loc: Kansas
Offline |
|
Cool - thanks, Connie. I've seen so much contradictory info on this ingredient, that I don't know who to believe. I noticed the "high in sugar" comment, but didn't catch the "cooked grains...essential part of a pet's diet" part. You're are right - that's a big blow to their credibility!
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Kori Bigge ]
#181866 - 02/21/2008 01:53 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 02-17-2008
Posts: 14
Loc: OHIO
Offline |
|
HI THIS IS MY FIRST POST.TO ADD,I ALSO READ THAT THIS PULP COULD ALSO PUT STRESS ON LIVER AND KIDNEYS
|
Top
|
Kelly wrote 02/21/2008 01:59 PM
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: JOE BAUER ]
#181867 - 02/21/2008 01:59 PM |
Moderator
Reg: 06-03-2005
Posts: 1495
Loc:
Offline |
|
I think sugar content depends on where the beet pulp comes from. The stuff fed to horses has been processed and the sugar taken out.
I don't know where the stuff in dog food comes from... that alone would be reason enough to not feed it to my dog!
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: JOE BAUER ]
#181868 - 02/21/2008 02:07 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 02-23-2007
Posts: 1102
Loc: Denver, CO
Offline |
|
Hi, funny this thread was revived since I was just reading about this yesterday. I was helping my sister look for dog food and came accross a kibble that has beet pulp. After reading more about it, it doesn't seem as bad as it sounds. I'm sure there is still some sugar left in it, but I think it's used more for fiber and a stool firmer. My dog is on raw, but I gave my sis, the thumbs up on the kibble we looked at.
Here's one of the sites I read: Link. I skimmed most of her website and I don't think she has anything to do with a certain dog food company. On one of her links, she has the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Assoc.
|
Top
|
Re: Isn't "beet pulp" a source of sugar?
[Re: Alex Corral ]
#181869 - 02/21/2008 02:23 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 02-17-2008
Posts: 14
Loc: OHIO
Offline |
|
IT SEEMS FROM MY RESEARCH THAT ITS JUST A FILLER.SOME WOULD ARGUE THAT ITS FOR FIBER.IM NOT QUALIFIED TO REALLY EVEN GIVE A GOOD OPINION BUT ITS IN EVEN THE CHEAPEST DOG FOOD
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.