Purely Positive???
#21410 - 08/25/2002 12:09 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 10-27-2001
Posts: 2261
Loc: Eastern Maine
Offline |
|
Well I think we should continue that discussion here.. I didn't want to close it, but since it is my first day on the job and all....
|
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21411 - 08/25/2002 12:10 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 10-27-2001
Posts: 2261
Loc: Eastern Maine
Offline |
|
Todd wrote:
Not trying to be a smartass. But I have to ask.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not use a clicker - hated it - or treats or toys in training. I do not withold food, I do not use prongs or chokes or pinches. I do not push rears down but I do place a hand on the ass end when I ask them to sit initially.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So do you walk around and wait for the dog to do something. Then give the command. For instance, the dog starts to sit. Do you then say sit. So after enough 'repeatings' as Bernhard would say. The dog associates the asking with the action?
|
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21412 - 08/25/2002 12:23 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-17-2001
Posts: 704
Loc:
Offline |
|
Todd,
Really you said that? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> Oh yes! Todd squirts them into compliance! Hehehe but really, that is a weird thing for you to say....I don't understand. I think total positive training is not only a silly idea, but hard to do as well for the normal person.. you REALLY REALLY need to be gifted to take a dog from pup to champ with ZERO compulsion...That's JMHO. My hats off to thoes who can do it...
Leute mögen Hunde, aber Leute LIEBEN ausgebildete Hunde! |
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21413 - 08/25/2002 12:26 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 10-27-2001
Posts: 2261
Loc: Eastern Maine
Offline |
|
This thread was a continuation of the dog doesn't like to walk thread... read and catch up with us Lonny.. then post away!
|
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21414 - 08/25/2002 12:26 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-11-2001
Posts: 697
Loc:
Offline |
|
no, no, no!
I said the second part. I was quoting someone else in another thread. Deanna moved it here.
|
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21415 - 08/25/2002 12:35 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-17-2001
Posts: 704
Loc:
Offline |
|
Shoot.. sorry guys, my bad.... I didn't think that sounded like Todd lol.. I'm always behind sorry <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />
Leute mögen Hunde, aber Leute LIEBEN ausgebildete Hunde! |
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21416 - 08/25/2002 12:36 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 09-05-2001
Posts: 390
Loc:
Offline |
|
No I don't do that Todd. What I am looking for is an explanation of how everything in training is compulsion. I am not a trainer and not looking for a scrap - just can someone please explain it without the side comments. Or explain the varying levels that would apply to my situation. That is all I am looking for, and it's what I have tried to grasp on other boards and I have not had it explained properly (or I am too thick) and I am sure the folks here can explain it to me so I will "get it". I am not a trainer and look here for experienced people to explain things. Thanks again. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21417 - 08/25/2002 12:36 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 08-03-2001
Posts: 1588
Loc:
Offline |
|
I was working on my reply in the other thread, so I'll try to approximate it here.
Addressing Josh, who said that the reason the majority of people here are so big on compulsion is that they are training working dogs (not his exact words, but what I understand his meaning to be). I beg to differ. I consider a working dog to be a Police K9, SAR dog, seeing eye/assistance dog, etc. The majority of people here train for sport, or have companion animals. While the dog should certainly think that this is his job, I don't think that this is the same as a "Working Dog". What might work well for competition obedience isn't neccessarily appropriate for SAR or for basic house dog obedience. You might be hard pressed to find a police K9 that has been trained with positive reinforcement only, but you'll be just as hard pressed to find an assistance dog that has NOT been trained primarily with positive reinforcement; and seeing eye/assistance dogs MUST be reliable. How do you train an assistance dog to ignore other dogs, people, cats, etc., without prong collar corrections? It is done routinely.
Deanna, I think part of the problem communicating has to do with understanding terminology. "Positive" reinforcement does not equal "pleasant", and "negative" reinforcement does not equal "unpleasant". "Compulsion", "correction", and "punishment" are three different things. You can compel a dog without it being a correction, and you can correct a dog without it being a punishment. My hesistancy to advise dragging a dog in this case isn't an opposition to compulsion in a general sense, but rather, that it's probably not neccessary, and could easily be counterproductive.
Todd, you finally got my point! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
Lisa & Lucy, CGC, Wilderness Airscent
Western Oregon Search Dogs |
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21418 - 08/25/2002 12:40 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-11-2001
Posts: 697
Loc:
Offline |
|
No I don't do that Todd. What I am looking for is an explanation of how everything in training is compulsion. I am not a trainer and not looking for a scrap - just can someone please explain it without the side comments. I was serious. I know people who 'train' like that. I was trying to figure out how you train so I could give an answer to 'your situation' Which BTW you haven't told us.
|
Top
|
Re: Purely Positive???
[Re: Deanna Thompson ]
#21419 - 08/25/2002 12:42 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-11-2001
Posts: 697
Loc:
Offline |
|
How do you train an assistance dog to ignore other dogs, people, cats, etc., without prong collar corrections? Breed low prey drive dogs. I think that would work. Boy, I am in a feisty mood tonight. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.