There is some pretty ignorant stuff written in this article, but I'm not sure the idea of a law that would require dog owners to control their animals would be a bad thing.
A dog has alot of friends because he wags his tail instead of his mouth.
Will Rambeau Moderator Reg: 01-25-2003
Posts: 5983
Loc: Idaho
Offline
And no mention anywhere in that article about simple getting a CCW and some decent training and using your Constitutional right to arm and protect yourself.
Morons.
Melissa Thom Webboard User Reg: 12-04-2007
Posts: 2781
Loc: Upper Left hand corner, USA
Offline
Quote: rob abel
Suing in civil court will not protect nor bring back Fifi.
IMO any solution that involves more lawyers is a bad one. Have to agree with Will upon reflection. How can you argue against self-reliance?
Oh, I'm with you. I do think self reliance is a good thing in a society but if the neighbor's kid breaks my window (as in what's done is done)they can either pay for the window, pay my insurance company, or we can go to court.
There are options which while they won't bring back your poodle in most places you can still claim at least the initial purchase price to attempt to "make it right". I just wasn't aware AZ was a state where dogs are consider non value objects.
I just wasn't aware AZ was a state where dogs are consider non value objects.
Hey, there are politicians here who consider certain classes of people "non value objects" so at least there is consistency.
Certain parts of town tend to harbor more loose dogs, and more loose, aggressive breeds. If I lived in one one of these areas, I'd have a firearm on my side at all times.
A dog has alot of friends because he wags his tail instead of his mouth.
Lincoln NE just changed their dog laws to define 'Invisible Fencing' as not a fence. Owners can now be cited for 'at large' dogs if they are not present and controling the dogs.
I like that. I like that even better than Overland Park KA law declaring invisible fences must be at least 10' from any side walk and that they may not be used in a front yard.
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Arizona couple seeks dog-on-dog attack state law
Top
Previous Topic
Index
Next Topic.jpg)
.jpg)
