Hello! I'm pretty new here, just been browsing some videos on Leerburg's YouTube but haven't had time to do extensive research. I was wondering if anyone would be willing to discuss the differences between marker and clicker training methods?
Clicker training usually refers to using only a clicker to mark a behavior while those that use a particular word (many use the word yes) would be more apt to be called marker training.
There are also many that call both marker training and clicker training as marker training.
Many here, including myself will and have used both but for beginners it's suggested to stick with one or the other.
Bob pretty much summed it up. The concept is the same for both.
Some added considerations for clicker vs voice might center around convenience or practicality. I've preferred using my voice ("yes") as my marker because I don't want to fumble with a clicker while I'm holding a leash and dispensing treats to reward the marker. For me, it's just less awkward. Also, if you are working with your dog close to others working with theirs, my dog can pick out my voice. She might not be able to distinguish a clicker I would be using if others are also using clickers nearby.
Otherwise, it's great to see you considering the use of marker training in either form. You'll be happy with the results. Good luck!
I built an entire vocabulary for my marker training. I am not sure how I would communicate some of the things that I do with a clicker. My dog's vocabulary has expanded and is now pretty big. We have our own language and we are always on the same page.
When I first started developing my marker system, I was under the impression that all clicker training was marker training but not all marker training was clicker training.
Yes, clicker training is just one form of marker training. We can use our voice instead or produce a sound with our tongue or by snapping our fingers.
At first I started with a clicker. I used the click as terminal marker. What I loved about the clicker: I was sure to produce each time exactly the same sound, which is more difficult with a word. Our words can easily change the intonation according to our momentary emotions (enthusiasm, impatience, anger ...) But we can train ourselves to use it consistently in the same intonation.
I then changed to use a word. "Ok!" as terminal marker, "Bom!" as duration marker. I changed it for the same reason as Greg describes. I feel less akward with my voice. Especially since I reward with raw food which is a bit slippery. It made my hands and my clicker slippery too. Result: I lost the exact timing, which is so important for marker training.
Another advantage of the verbal marker: I've never forgotten to take my voice with me, I never lost it on road and it never happened that it all of a sudden didn't function any more. All this happened to me with clickers.
I'm convinced clicker training is a good thing. I'm still using it now and then at home, just to keep the dogs accustomed to it. But actually I do prefer my voice.
“If you can keep your head when all around you are losing theirs, then you are a leader” – Rudyard Kipling
Thank you for the info everyone! I have used clicker training methods for the past few years with my horses and dogs. I feel like the details of marker training are exactly what I've been trying to do and illustrate the reasons I don't usually get along with other "clicker trainers". Looking forward to practicing more
I agree, many clicker trainers think that any form of correction is a terrible cruelty! It can be very frustrating to talk about training techniques with them
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.