Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Mike J Schoonbrood ]
#161965 - 11/09/2007 07:47 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-19-2006
Posts: 842
Loc: Arizona
Offline |
|
If you are not dedicated to owning a PPD, this means accepting the liabilities and exercising the neccesary vigilence and precautions to avoid liabilities, then you shouldn't own one.
A PPD should bite if the handler is assaulted -- as David said, it is as simple as someone putting their hands on the handler.
*I agree with this. No point having the dog if he will not protect you when attacked.
The reality is, what most people perceive to be a PPD, is not really a PPD. The type of dog that would make a great PPD is the type of dog most people cannot handle, don't want to handle, or feel is too much of a liaility for their suburban family lifestyle to support. The trend with PPD's is to have a fluffy family dog that can tollerate all the crap kids can dish out without eating the child alive, then be expected to be a nasty monster in the event that a situation were to arise where the dog should protect. The types of dogs that make the best PPD's are dogs that aren't really that great as family dogs, but there is little doubt left in your mind as to whether the dog will actually bite.
*This is interesting because I know that most people looking for a PPD look for a very intense/high drive dog. However, I have been told by many trainers that a good PPD should be social w/everyone, be good around family and friends but have the ability to engage ANY individual when commanded to do so. It appears there really are a lot of differing opinions on this note.
Just because a dog looks good on the suit, or runs into people wearing a muzzle, does not mean the dog will bite a person, or bite them properly, the first time they are subjected to a real life scenario. Even many police dogs have trouble with their first street bite. A law enforcement officer has somewhat of a luxury to go back in training and address the issue. A civilian will likely never use their dog to bite someone, if it happens, it'll be a one time deal. You want the dog to DO IT, not uhm and err about it. For this, you need a strong, natural dog. Often this means owning a dog that won't tollerate stupid crap like strangers coming up behind you and petting the dog, or people being physical with you when they are having a conversation, tapping your arm etc. These are the types of dogs where the training is more focused on control, rather than teaching the dog to bite, because the dogs genetics already make the dog want to bite everyone.
*This is why I chose not to involve myself w/Schutzhund. When I first started this I had no idea that Schutzhund wasnt protection training, w/o some good advice and people in my corner and the desire to approach things correctly I might have gone that route instead of PPD training. All it took was for someone to tell me that a dog with Sch training might not take the bite w/o the sleeve and I was looking outside the box.
What most people really want is a big dog that barks aggressively and puts on a good enough show to instill a false sense of security that the dog will actually save their life no matter what. Kinda like gated communities -- the guard is there to deter, but if someone hops over the wall, the guard will sit in his guard house and dial 911 for you.
*Not acceptable, I don't believe that we live in a world where there is room for any error. If a dog is told to bite there should be no doubt in my mind that he will engage.
The "right" PPD could still live in the house as a family dog, but the dog is a different type of dog to what most people would consider a "suitable family pet" that will let all the kids friends play with him and lets everyone walk into the house without a peep.
*I have commented several times on the fact that Levi rarely barks or shows concern when people come into our home. I have been told that this is a sign of good nerves. Is this to say that if my 12 month old gsd isn't creating havoc when strangers come into the house that he is already showing signs of not being able to do this work? I respect your opinions.
Jay Belcher and Levi
Levi/Bella/Drogo |
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: RobbinMann ]
#161966 - 11/09/2007 07:48 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-19-2006
Posts: 842
Loc: Arizona
Offline |
|
hmm..first time I ever quoted..didnt come out right. ~sigh~
**** Note: You have put your own comments inside the "quote" words that enclose Mike's post. Your comments have to be outside the "quote" enclosures. ****
Edited by Connie Sutherland (11/09/2007 10:43 AM)
Edit reason: posting error
Jay Belcher and Levi
Levi/Bella/Drogo |
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Mike J Schoonbrood ]
#161970 - 11/09/2007 08:15 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 01-09-2007
Posts: 556
Loc: Upstate NY
Offline |
|
Wow Mike -- fabulous post!
And Norman -- your list for a PPD is certainly well spelled out and obviously thought out. The need for that amount of clarity seems absolutely necessary.
Katie
SG S'Eliana vom Kraftwerk IPO3,AD,CGC,KKL1
Jaya von der Olgameister AD, CGC
Pierre, the Poodle! |
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Katie O'Connor ]
#161975 - 11/09/2007 08:57 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-25-2006
Posts: 2665
Loc: AZ
Offline |
|
What David described is what I want of my dog (in training for PPD), minus the pursuit of anyone of course.
What Mike said regarding liability, family dog situation, being around children, etc, are things I have on my mind anytime I take him anywhere. As far as my dog taking that first bite if it's ever needed, I hope I never have to find out (I think that he may with enough training) but if the occasion arises I would have to trust in several factors. Factors like his training and him himself, what I've seen and know about him so far (he's still a 16 mo old pup).
I don't quite understand what Norman meant when he said "I want a dog who will engage on a passive individual." ? What type scenario might that be - I think I'm missing something.
|
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: RobbinMann ]
#161979 - 11/09/2007 09:08 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 04-30-2005
Posts: 2784
Loc: Toronto, ON
Offline |
|
*I have commented several times on the fact that Levi rarely barks or shows concern when people come into our home. I have been told that this is a sign of good nerves. Is this to say that if my 12 month old gsd isn't creating havoc when strangers come into the house that he is already showing signs of not being able to do this work? I respect your opinions.
I personally believe a dog needs a little nerve or an edge to them to be a good PPD. The dog needs to be looking for a threat, and be unforgiving when displaying aggression.
12 months is young though, it could just be slow maturity and come out later. I personally like pups that show alot of aggression young, but you need to be careful not to misread the type of aggression.
*This is interesting because I know that most people looking for a PPD look for a very intense/high drive dog. However, I have been told by many trainers that a good PPD should be social w/everyone, be good around family and friends but have the ability to engage ANY individual when commanded to do so. It appears there really are a lot of differing opinions on this note.
Yes, lots of differing opinion on this and I'm sure many people will disagree with me. From what I can tell, most of that "social" thought process comes from sales and marketing. Theres really not that many people who want to own the type of dog that would make the best PPD. To me this is compromising, the more social and accepting the dog (toward strangers, not family), the less serious he will be in his work as a protection dog.
You wouldn't believe how many dogs will stop barking at me in the middle of bitework when I sit down on the ground and offer them a blade of grass or a stick from the ground, acting like I'm their friend. I would rather have the antisocial unforgiving dog that is more intent on biting someone than trying to figure out if it's OK to bite this person because the person isn't being threatening. I would rather have a natural response than a trained response, although you can train these things into a dog which is what most people do.
Someone put it pretty nicely one day. "This dog isn't a soldier, but we can train him to believe he is".
Lots of people also like to justify what makes a great dog based on what their dog is like, rather than accepting their dogs shortcomings. Being aware of and accepting a dogs shortcomings can be the difference between having a great dog, and having everyone believe you have a great dog.
Ed Frawley always talks about an "aloof" dog. I think this is a great middleground between having an antisocial dog and a social dog. The problem is though, when people don't understand what an "aloof" dog really is. Notice a pattern?? its all about interpretation, and the human desire to categorize things into the categories they want things to be categorized in, rather than where they should be. To me anyway, an aloof dog is a dog that genetically doesn't care about people, at all. It's not trained or conditioned, although you can condition it, its genetic. A dog that just doesn't even care about people, doesn't make any attempt to make friends with them, doesn't want anything to do with them, doesn't enjoy being petted by strangers and is, essentially, a very boring dog to anyone that doesn't know the dog, and is looking for a reason to not trust the person doing the petting.
|
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Mike J Schoonbrood ]
#161980 - 11/09/2007 09:10 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 04-30-2005
Posts: 2784
Loc: Toronto, ON
Offline |
|
I don't quite understand what Norman meant when he said "I want a dog who will engage on a passive individual." ? What type scenario might that be - I think I'm missing something.
Lets say someone breaks into your house, you spot them, you send your dog, the guy runs out the door and hides in the bushes. Your dog finds the guy, but thinks "well, the guy ain't moving, I'll just stand here and bark". That's a dog that will not engage a passive suspect, and represents either a lack of willingness from the dog, or poor training.
|
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Mike J Schoonbrood ]
#161984 - 11/09/2007 09:21 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-25-2006
Posts: 2665
Loc: AZ
Offline |
|
Ah, I think I understand, thanks Mike. Probably where I live I would be in trouble legally if my dog aggressed on a passive guy hiding in my bushes out front, but if the guy was in my house, say hiding behind a door (being passive in the sense that he's not moving), or in my backyard behind a bush, is this an instance where I would want the dog to attack?
|
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Mike J Schoonbrood ]
#161985 - 11/09/2007 09:22 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 06-30-2005
Posts: 974
Loc: northeast
Offline |
|
Robbin, if you can have people in the house and the dog is good around the kids it sounds like a good dog for your lifestyle. The kind of dog Mike is describing is a pain in the butt to own and is another whole learning process and the dog has to managed ALL of the time, definitely not for everyone.
AL
|
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Mike J Schoonbrood ]
#161989 - 11/09/2007 09:36 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 04-02-2007
Posts: 749
Loc: Canada
Offline |
|
Lots of people also like to justify what makes a great dog based on what their dog is like, rather than accepting their dogs shortcomings. Being aware of and accepting a dogs shortcomings can be the difference between having a great dog, and having everyone believe you have a great dog.
Obviously a great dog is relitave to its purpose: PPD, pet, therapy, whatever.
Whatever your dog's purpose there is a lot of wisdom in this quote. Thanks for sharing it. I might even have to save it to remember it and remind myself of it often.
|
Top
|
Re: Training to bite w/o a command?
[Re: Al Curbow ]
#161995 - 11/09/2007 09:58 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 04-30-2005
Posts: 2784
Loc: Toronto, ON
Offline |
|
Robbin, if you can have people in the house and the dog is good around the kids it sounds like a good dog for your lifestyle. The kind of dog Mike is describing is a pain in the butt to own and is another whole learning process and the dog has to managed ALL of the time, definitely not for everyone.
AL
Kinda like your pup
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.