I am going to stir the pot in some circles by saying this is just small lesson to those who expect a high degree of obedience by molding a behavior with positive reinforcement to a point of a fully condition performance and then discover you want a more clean movement or a few “bugs ” worked out in reliability.
Many people practice and train under the philosophy that exclusive use of positive operant methods is the best way to teach a dog. Proponents of this ideology will cite the absolute necessity to mold an expected behavior first then fix problems with compulsion if necessary later. Many pet people have lower expectation of good obedience so many trainers can ‘get way by’ with an 8 week session of click and clap training because the methods used by positive only training does produce a result in performance.
This gives the impression of sound obedience because the dog responds to a command and does it for his reward. The problem is while any dog can very easily understand his movement = reward, he or she often does not understand the difference of doing it for the reward or doing it because it was told to.
I have mentioned in the past as a responsible dog owner you must have control over your dog and its behavior. Your influence as an owner must be seated in an actual and natural leadership dog’s respect. This does not mean harsh punishments and super domination techniques. I consider good trainers not punishers but they are willful and tenacious.
Having come to the conclusion that dogs conditioned without trainer RESOLVE leads to greater conflict in the end. Feeling confident about this conclusion, I have come to understand most handler aggressive problems (aside from pain induced aggression) comes from a dog feeling he is being unjustly dominated or he is being unfairly punished and has not learned fully he is not in charge. This feeling is the result of not establishing fair leadership in a balanced way using rewards along with some leash work in the form of corrections.
Remember how you train a dog is how they tend to be. Having a clear understanding of your future expectations and adjusting your training program to meet this standard will be the best advice for owners with untrained dogs.
I recommend not to teach anything until your dog has a clear understanding that rewards are and "good dog" means something it likes and wants again. When a dog knows about the benifits of doing a command it needs to them learn the only option it has is to do the command that lead to it.
Those that think the majority of trainers can accomplish superb performance by reward conditioning alone but I disagree with this premise. I say this because reward values in different environments fluctuate in the dog’s mind and the dog’s actual mood or desire fluctuates like any other sentient being.
You shouldn’t teach a SIT before your dog knows he MUST follow you on the leash and knows he MUST pay attention to your directives. Don’t teach a DOWN before your dog knows to sit when told to each and every time and you have achieved and you have fooled trough with rewarding performance after the dog knows his obligation to comply to your command and so on.
If your dog doesn’t like to have a collar placed on his head then have the will to get him use to it and not associate it as a bad thing. A "collar smart" dog will be a bane to your off leash training goals so fix this problem now with a plan.
This plan is simple do nothing more in training until you have achieved this one goal then move on to the next. Break down your training, no matter what you are trying to train, into the smallest increments for the best chances achieving your training goals.
Once again understand what your future expectations are and good luck.
A dog teaches a boy fidelity, perseverance, and to turn around three times before lying down. - Robert Benchley
In order to really enjoy a dog, one doesn't merely try to train him to be semi-human. The point of it is to open oneself to the possibility of becoming partly a dog. - Edward Hoagland