Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Michael_Wise ]
#243220 - 06/10/2009 11:24 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
Yeah, but ....
I would add that if grinding is what it takes to make you comfortable with feeding fresh raw food, then grind away!
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Michael_Wise ]
#243221 - 06/10/2009 11:33 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-22-2006
Posts: 1824
Loc: Cambridge, MA
Offline |
|
There is even documentation from zoo researchers that soft food helps the disease take hold and progress..........but I'm sure they also have documentation of choking and bone shard incidents and deaths.
When I took Oscar to the doggie dentist for his root canal (broken molar due to marrow bone incident) she told me that she used to serve as appointed dentist for the animals at a local zoo. Zoo keepers naturally try to provide food that is as appropriate for each animal as possible, and the hyenas were getting a lot of whole legs of lamb and similar "bone-in" chunks of mammal meat. Well, after years of multiple serious fractures (requiring root canals), and even repeat repairs to those root canals, the zoo decided that the risks of that particular mode of raw feeding were too great (most likely in terms of expense AND stress to the animals from every dental procedure that needed doing), and they stopped feeding meat with bones in it. In this particular case, I would probably agree with the zoo's decision, just as I stopped giving Oscar marrow bones - knowing what I now do about his chewing style, the risk of another bad tooth fracture is far scarier to me than the little extra buildup of plaque on his teeth that bone gnawing would probably help keep off. Other people side on the complete opposite side of that issue though, and I would never chastise anyone for their choice.
Still, I think there are so many "maybe's" in life that you just have to pick what feels best to you.
It's all about weighing personal factors, and each circumstance is unique.
~Natalya
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#243222 - 06/10/2009 11:35 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-22-2006
Posts: 1824
Loc: Cambridge, MA
Offline |
|
Yeah, but ....
I would add that if grinding is what it takes to make you comfortable with feeding fresh raw food, then grind away!
A big "YES!!" to that!
~Natalya
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Michael_Wise ]
#243225 - 06/10/2009 11:59 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 05-09-2005
Posts: 1340
Loc: SE Michigan
Offline |
|
Grinding, IMO:wink:, completely negates all the tooth cleaning effects of gnawing and tearing in to raw meat and bones. Essentially giving it the same poor tooth cleaning quality of kibble or canned food.
E.T.A. If there is a medical problem that makes grinding a must, then I agree 100% with grinding.
I have to disagree. My GSD is 7 years old and has been raw fed for the last 3 years. She has some staining on her teeth from kibble fed years, but no buildup and has never had a dental cleaning. She also does not chew on recreational bones and doesn't chew anything that could be cleaning her teeth. She probably has a whole RMB meal once or twice every three months. She does have EPI, which is the reason she eats ground meats. My other GSD is 3 years old, ate kibble for the first year of her life, and her teeth are spotless white and no cleaning has ever been done. She eats ground meats simply because it is easier to feed the same thing to both dogs.
That said - I do think whole RMBs are just fine lol.
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Melissa Hoyer ]
#243270 - 06/10/2009 10:24 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 02-10-2008
Posts: 727
Loc: Kentucky
Offline |
|
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Nora Ferrell ]
#243272 - 06/10/2009 10:54 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-10-2006
Posts: 4454
Loc: Arkansas
Offline |
|
You crack me up, Nora.
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Michael_Wise ]
#243273 - 06/10/2009 11:16 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-10-2006
Posts: 4454
Loc: Arkansas
Offline |
|
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Michael_Wise ]
#243275 - 06/10/2009 11:42 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-22-2006
Posts: 1824
Loc: Cambridge, MA
Offline |
|
Good call Michael.
~Natalya
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Natalya Zahn ]
#243276 - 06/10/2009 11:47 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-10-2006
Posts: 4454
Loc: Arkansas
Offline |
|
Good call Michael.
~Natalya You shoulda been in my head the moment I remembered it.
Pretty sure I heard angels singing in perfect harmony.........
|
Top
|
Re: The "splintered bones" concern
[Re: Michael_Wise ]
#243278 - 06/11/2009 05:52 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-24-2008
Posts: 921
Loc: Indiana
Offline |
|
Alrighty...how about pressure cooking? Bones are soft, pressure cooking is supposed to minimize the loss of vitamins and minerals, so it would be a bridge for those who want to feed bones but are afraid of splintering, food is "cooked" but still valuable as having minerals and vitamins, and not that labor intensive? Am I wrong? If so, let me know.
AND, to be honest, I am now afraid to go back to raw edible bones because Hambone was choking on his dinner and I had to dog a doggy Heimlich on him...terrified me that I was going to lose my boy to a bone after all the crap he is going through.
NOT said to discourage anyone, but it is a fact that it can happen. So, pressure cooking a viable action?
Look! I DO fit in the bag. |
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.