Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34625 - 06/08/2003 11:35 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-13-2001
Posts: 143
Loc:
Offline |
|
"Many herding experts say that some herding dogs (including most dogs in some of the herding breeds) are motivated to herd primarly through pack drive to control the livestock, whom they view as subordinate pack members. Not prey drive." I think "pack drive" in the context of herding has more to do with the man/dog relationship than the sheep/dog relationship. IMO the term "pack drive" is misleading when it is used to describe an interactive relationship between prey and predator -- packs of dogs behave differently than flocks of sheep -- IOW sheep will never conform to the dog's "pack behavior" and dogs will never conform to sheep's "flocking behavior". However, the pack has a built-in rank order system -- or a leadership heirarchy. This is why "pack drive" is important in herding. But it's importance is in the man/dog relationship because it allows the shepherd (who CAN conform to the dog's "pack behavior") to be accepted by the dog as a leader.
IMO he dog LEARNS (is taught by the shepherd) to treat the sheep as subordinate members of its pack. However, it is the shepherd who IMPOSES that pack order (man-dog-sheep) and ENFORCES that pack order if the dog does not accept it or learn to respect it over time. Without training or education the dog would not naturally view sheep as pack members, subordinate or otherwise -- they would be prey.
The tool to train obedience in the dogs isn't pack drive either, it is still desire to engage in the herding behavior. If "genetic obedience" is defined as "a strong willingness to please the shepherd and to accept the shepherd as the leader", and, if one aspect of "pack drive" includes accepting man/shepherd as leader, then pack drive could be considered a tool to train obedience. JMO <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
It sounds to me like this genetic obedience you are referring to as a desirable trait in the herding lines is almost in opposition to the trait of handler hardness which is often selected for in lines bred largely for some type of protection/bite work. The following is a quote from John Holmes regarding "hardness" in a herding dog: "A "hard" dog is strong-willed and the stronger the will-power of the dog, the stronger is the will-power necessary to control it. Many of the problems with which I have to deal arise through the dog having more will-power than the owner."
I like this definition because it doesn't limit or pigeonhole qualities used to define a "hard" dog and, most importantly, IMO it allows for balance in the dog's temperament. IOW a dog can have qualities associated with "sensitivity" and "biddability" and still be a "hard" dog on the job. This will-power is also what makes training the "hard" dog more challenging. You can't force this kind of dog to work with a "my way or the highway" attitude. You have to teach the dog via a cooperative relationship as opposed to an adversarial one.
Ellen Nickelsberg |
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34626 - 06/08/2003 11:47 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 11-28-2001
Posts: 3916
Loc:
Offline |
|
Ellen quote, by Laura: "The shepherd was channeling her drive and energy into purposeful work to serve his sheep herding needs. The shepherd's encouraging, calming, directing voice kept him in constant contact with the dog -- he never gave her the opportunity to fall into a pattern of errors in performance."
LAURA!!!!, this is exactly what I'm saying. The dog working on the sheep is self rewarding by working the animals (Rewarding Predatory Behavior), the praise is a secondary reward that is helping to shape behavior. . .herding behavior. . .prey behavior.
The primary reason the dog is herding, the primary reason it continues to herd, is the prey reward, not the praise. The praise is a secondary reward, not as important to the dog as the reward of herding.
You can still shape behavior with a secondary reward, while the dog is self rewarding (herding).
The dog isn't herding because of praise!! Additional reward is helping to shape the herding behavior.
A dog without the primary predatory herding instinct can have as much genetic obedience as you want him to. . .still won't make him a herding dog. He has to have the drive for the work because that is the primary reward for the behavior.
|
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34627 - 06/08/2003 11:55 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 11-28-2001
Posts: 3916
Loc:
Offline |
|
Hold on, I didn't say that pack drive isn't a tool for training obedience and herding. . .If you follow the whole argument, I said it is a secondary reward to the prey reward.
You are using praise to help shape a behavior that is being nearly constantly rewarded.
|
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34628 - 06/09/2003 12:02 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 11-28-2001
Posts: 3916
Loc:
Offline |
|
This thread is in dire need of a move to continue this herding conversation.
I'm going to move the thread to the herding section and hopefully keep this one open here to continue the treat or no treat discussion.
|
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34629 - 06/09/2003 12:05 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 11-28-2001
Posts: 3916
Loc:
Offline |
|
Now we can continue the herding discussion here. Sorry if I cut anybody's comments off mid-post.
|
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34630 - 06/09/2003 12:22 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-28-2002
Posts: 393
Loc:
Offline |
|
Originally posted by Ellen Nickelsberg:
I think "pack drive" in the context of herding has more to do with the man/dog relationship than the sheep/dog relationship. IMO the term "pack drive" is misleading when it is used to describe an interactive relationship between prey and predator -- packs of dogs behave differently than flocks of sheep -- IOW sheep will never conform to the dog's "pack behavior" and dogs will never conform to sheep's "flocking behavior". However, the pack has a built-in rank order system -- or a leadership heirarchy. This is why "pack drive" is important in herding. But it's importance is in the man/dog relationship because it allows the shepherd (who CAN conform to the dog's "pack behavior") to be accepted by the dog as a leader.
I agree 100%. It is clear the trained dog defers order in his pack/family and without this order the dog would make up his own mind about accepted behavior with reguard to the sheep thus defining herding and who is "in" the pack himself... umm not the best idea I think if we want walking live sheep. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />
A dog teaches a boy fidelity, perseverance, and to turn around three times before lying down. - Robert Benchley
In order to really enjoy a dog, one doesn't merely try to train him to be semi-human. The point of it is to open oneself to the possibility of becoming partly a dog. - Edward Hoagland |
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34631 - 06/09/2003 12:28 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-13-2001
Posts: 143
Loc:
Offline |
|
Originally posted by VanCamp Robert:
Now we can continue the herding discussion here. Sorry if I cut anybody's comments off mid-post. You did. HOW RUDE!! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" /> Or, how convenient since I think I had a gotcha <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> Anyway, you can't escape because I'll repeat myself .........
Hold on, I didn't say that pack drive isn't a tool for training obedience and herding. . . No........you said:
The tool to train obedience in the dogs isn't pack drive either, it is still desire to engage in the herding behavior. If a dog is screwing off, you don't let them get at the work. . .while on lead. . .or you put the dog up. . . whatever. Hey, Bobby-booby, correct me if I'm wrong (as I'm sure you will ) but you say "If a dog is screwing off, you don't let them get at the work. . . while on lead . . . or you put the dog up. . . whatever." Isn't that asserting your leadership role in the pack ....... OR ....... utilizing pack drive??? Negative maybe but pack drive ala leadership just the same.
Ellen Nickelsberg |
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34632 - 06/09/2003 12:38 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-28-2002
Posts: 393
Loc:
Offline |
|
A dog teaches a boy fidelity, perseverance, and to turn around three times before lying down. - Robert Benchley
In order to really enjoy a dog, one doesn't merely try to train him to be semi-human. The point of it is to open oneself to the possibility of becoming partly a dog. - Edward Hoagland |
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34633 - 06/09/2003 01:17 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-16-2001
Posts: 165
Loc:
Offline |
|
|
Top
|
Re: to treat or not to treat?
[Re: Janet Marshall ]
#34634 - 06/09/2003 01:47 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 07-16-2001
Posts: 165
Loc:
Offline |
|
Originally posted by VanCamp Robert:
LAURA!!!!, this is exactly what I'm saying. The dog working on the sheep is self rewarding by working the animals (Rewarding Predatory Behavior), the praise is a secondary reward that is helping to shape behavior. . .herding behavior. . .prey behavior.
You seem to be stuck in a primary versus secondary rut. It depends on the dog. I suggested that you check out what folks say on various herding lists. I just re-read some of it. Indeed, there are some who work dogs in herding (not just hobby herding but practical working herding) saying that the MAIN reason their dog herds is to please them, the pack leader, not out of prey drive toward their livestock. There are also others who speak of the pack driven "bossiness" toward livestock as the primary motivation for their dogs to herd, not prey drive. And of course still others speak of prey drive...or "modified prey drive"... or "truncated prey drive" as a motivator for dogs to herd.
The take home message I picked up from all of this is that the balance of drives that herding dogs direct toward their livestock (the "attraction") varies among individual dogs. Ultimately, the variations are based on the choices that breeders make based on their needs and personal preferences.
Laura
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.