Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#151603 - 08/13/2007 09:08 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 08-12-2007
Posts: 38
Loc: New Hampshire
Offline |
|
I know we are looking to get as close to whole prey as possible, but I was under the impression that whole chickens tend to have way to much meat?
What ratio where you seeing when you disected the chicken?
And what kind of chicken was it?
I think there is a large difference between chicken raised for human consumption fattened up as quick as possible and a lean wild prey item built for survival.
Just curious.
-Andy Deitz- |
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Andy Deitz ]
#151606 - 08/13/2007 09:55 PM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
I know we are looking to get as close to whole prey as possible, but I was under the impression that whole chickens tend to have way to much meat?
What ratio where you seeing when you disected the chicken?
And what kind of chicken was it?
I think there is a large difference between chicken raised for human consumption fattened up as quick as possible and a lean wild prey item built for survival.
Just curious.
Absolutely ... poultry raised for meat has way more meat (and fat) than a wild bird -- especially breast meat.
This was not a great scientific experiment, for several reasons. All we had were a few different grocery chickens; we could look at visible fat only, since we didn't go as far as rendering the fat out of the meat; we had three (I think) birds, as opposed to a large sampling.
The idea was that we wanted to see which parts seemed to be the most similar (in a rough breakdown) to the entire bird. Since most of us were using poultry for most of the RMB part of our dogs' diets, and since we were using all farm-raised purchased poultry, that's what we looked at.
We saw about 80% meat (including fat and skin) and about 20% bone.
Of the meat, we saw about 20% visible fat (including skin).
Of course, visible fat is pretty useless as a means of determining fat percent.
The whole exercise was strictly a visual comparison of parts to the whole.
There are many other comparisons it would have been nice to be able to do, such as wild-to-farm, or fat on older v. younger birds, and so on.
But we pretty much got what we wanted, which was an idea of which parts were roughly similar to the whole animal with regard to the calcium-phosphorous ratio.
When you say "too much meat," do you mean an unnatural meat-to-bone ratio? I imagine that's true. OTOH, I'd guess that even commercial poultry (consumed in its entirety) would yield a good proportion of bone/cartilage compared to a big ungulate whose leg bones are probably cracked open for marrow but otherwise left by the wolf.
Interesting stuff. And again, your point about variety is a very good one.
P.S. I tend to rely very heavily on poultry for the RMB part of my dogs' diet, and to add variety via the "other" components. I guess many raw feeders do.
|
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#151608 - 08/13/2007 10:53 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 08-12-2007
Posts: 38
Loc: New Hampshire
Offline |
|
When you say "too much meat," do you mean an unnatural meat-to-bone ratio? I imagine that's true.
Thats exactly what I mean. Especially being of a farm raised variety.
I see your point with the large prey however.
P.S. I tend to rely very heavily on poultry for the RMB part of my dogs' diet, and to add variety via the "other" components. I guess many raw feeders do.
I use alot of poultry as well, but like to mix it up a good amount of the time with rodents.
Mice, rats, rabbits, and g. pigs I find to be an excellent addition to poultry in the rmb category that most people wont, or dont think to use.
A nice Jumbo rat, now thats a whole natural meal.
-Andy Deitz- |
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Rick Miller ]
#151642 - 08/14/2007 09:56 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 05-21-2007
Posts: 18
Loc:
Offline |
|
I have a 9 month old alaskan malamute and decided to switch him to raw. I tried to feed him nature's variety venison and lamb patties. It also has bone, organ meat, eggs and veggies in it.
He sniffed it and walked away even though I know he was hungry (he had not eaten all day) I attempted to hand feed him a small piece and he shook his head back and forth as if he was saying no. I also tried to put a piece in his mouth and he spit it out and made faces. any suggestions on getting him started on raw
thanks, jamie
|
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Jamie M. Minchew ]
#151644 - 08/14/2007 10:08 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-06-2005
Posts: 2686
Loc: llinois
Offline |
|
I have a 9 month old alaskan malamute and decided to switch him to raw. I tried to feed him nature's variety venison and lamb patties. It also has bone, organ meat, eggs and veggies in it.
He sniffed it and walked away even though I know he was hungry (he had not eaten all day) I attempted to hand feed him a small piece and he shook his head back and forth as if he was saying no. I also tried to put a piece in his mouth and he spit it out and made faces. any suggestions on getting him started on raw
thanks, jamie
Fast him for a few days. Once he figures out that he's not getting anything else, his attitude will change. Of course, that's my way (the mean way) and I'm sure others will offer more gentle ways. I wouldn't let the dog think it was a big deal, which is why I'd just do it quickly with the fasting method. If you make a big deal out of it, he'll surely get suspicious.
|
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Jamie M. Minchew ]
#151645 - 08/14/2007 10:10 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-30-2005
Posts: 4531
Loc: South Dakota, USA
Offline |
|
Have you tried just raw chicken (with the skin removed)? Just to get him started? Or some ground chicken or turkey?
I helped switch my parents dog to raw and he would refuse the raw meat at first too, so I boiled skinless/boneless chicken breasts just enough to cook it on the outside and raw on the inside (were not even warm in the middle) and voila.....he now eats raw. My mom grinds his meat (bone in) because she does not like feeding him whole bones.
Until The Tale of the Lioness is told, the Story will Always Glorfy the Hunter |
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Carol Boche ]
#151665 - 08/14/2007 11:27 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
Or some ground chicken or turkey?
That's what I have used with seniors who were suspicious at first. Maybe it was the texture, because once they try the ground poultry, they have no problem with a gradual transition to the RMBs. Or that's what my experience has been.
|
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#152198 - 08/17/2007 06:36 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 05-21-2007
Posts: 18
Loc:
Offline |
|
Wouldn't eat the ground poultry either. I think I will try the chicken breasts
|
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Jamie M. Minchew ]
#152208 - 08/17/2007 06:54 PM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
Wouldn't eat the ground poultry either. I think I will try the chicken breasts
Chicken breasts were the parts my suspicious senior adoptees were most suspicious about. That was why I assumed it was a "new texture" issue.
Is this dog by any chance getting kibble too?
|
Top
|
Re: First Taste of Raw Meat
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#153269 - 08/26/2007 04:42 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 05-21-2007
Posts: 18
Loc:
Offline |
|
Gave him raw chicken breasts and he ate them no problem. He seems to have a problem with the nature's variety patties. There must be something in them that he does not like.
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.