Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Jim Nash ]
#99028 - 02/23/2006 03:01 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 09-14-2005
Posts: 587
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Offline |
|
If the first shot didn't dispatch the dog, shoot again and put it out of it's misery. = waste of ammunition that could be used on a hostile entity willing to SHOOT BACK.
I would think that a silenced 9mm or .40 would have be more stealthy. = too many James Bond movies.
We should look at the bigger picture here! Those officers did the best job they could given the situation. Yes it is unfortunate that the dogs died but it is not the recourse of the actions of the enrty team but the criminals behind the scenes, as was mentioned earlier.
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Brad . Martin ]
#99029 - 02/23/2006 03:03 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 11-04-2005
Posts: 31
Loc:
Offline |
|
Martin,
Numerous judges have ruled otherwise, so I guess it's a mute point.
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Frank Vital ]
#99030 - 02/23/2006 03:20 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-26-2002
Posts: 329
Loc:
Offline |
|
Frank ,
The judges in that part of the country have proven over and over again that they don't care much for the safety of police officers . Numerous judges throughout the country have ruled in favor of police officers in similiar situations .
It just shows me they are still up to their habit of making knee jerk descisions based on emotions in reguard to how these dogs were dealt with .
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Jim Nash ]
#99031 - 02/23/2006 03:23 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 11-04-2005
Posts: 31
Loc:
Offline |
|
Well,
You have more experience than I so I'll defer to the experts. But I'd like to think that the checks and balances our founding fathers put in place would prevent a "ends justifies the means" mentality from influencing the judical system.
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Jim Nash ]
#99032 - 02/23/2006 03:47 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 01-14-2005
Posts: 155
Loc: Beaumont, Texas
Offline |
|
Jim this one went up to the US Supreme Court. Not exactly a bastion of wild eyed liberals. If the city was in the right then they should have tried the case. Nobody forced them to settle.
Trent
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Trent Bond ]
#99033 - 02/23/2006 03:54 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 01-14-2005
Posts: 155
Loc: Beaumont, Texas
Offline |
|
Nevermind, I made the mistake of trusting CNN all the Supreme Court did was deny cert. The City still should have tried the case if they felt in the right IMHO.
Trent
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Trent Bond ]
#99034 - 02/23/2006 03:55 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 12-26-2002
Posts: 329
Loc:
Offline |
|
Trent ,
You as a lawyer should know the many reasons for settling a case . Many cases are settled even though nothing was done wrong . The rulings and law suit didn't involve just how the dogs were dealt with either . The issue of the dogs was one of many other issues .
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Jim Nash ]
#99035 - 02/23/2006 11:27 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 04-25-2003
Posts: 107
Loc:
Offline |
|
Frank ,
Do you know much about the biker gangs ?
Do you know anything about the safety concerns or threats a SWAT team member has to deal with on a high risk warrant like this ?
If not here's some information for you . Their clubs and houses are usually heavily fortified . Barred windows heavy steel doors , cameras covering all angles of their houses and booby traps .
It's VERY common for them to get guard dogs to attack intruders . Their specific intent with having guard dogs is to use them against police , rival bikers , and other assorted dirtbags that know they have stuff worth getting . All these purposes are due to their illegal activities . Their dogs buy them time to arm themselves or destroy evidence while the police are dealing with the dogs .
I know SWAT members who have been bitten buy some of these dogs . The dogs put these officers in an even more dangerous situation because the officer is now open to attack by the suspects inside . One of the biker's homes we raided had 6' chainlink fencing , cameras all angles , 2 very aggressive guard dogs , reinforced windows and doors . He also had a special treat for the officers doing the evidence search after the initial high risk entry . Live COBRAS in trash barrels with lids on them .
Their clubhouse was the most heavily fortified building I've every seen a warrant served on in our area . The bikers inside all knew their job on what to do when the cops come and went to work as soon as they saw the team coming . Thanks to some new entry techniques the teams got through the fortified door quicker then the badguys expected and the team members and badguys all came out alive .
These bikers have been responsible for numerous very gruesome murders , drug dealing , extortion , robberies , amongst numerous other violent crimes . They have proven over and over again to be some of the most violent organizations in our country . They are some of the most sophisticated and well armed criminal organizations also .
They knew what they were doing with those dogs and knew what the outcome would be by using them that way (this wasn't the first time there dogs had to be shot during a high risk entry). Sueing law enforcement officers is also a VERY common tactic for them in an attempt to deter law enforcement from dealing with them .
In this case they won because the court fell into the trap of a knee jerk reaction to seeing an animal killed . They totally missed who was really responsible and that's the suspects that put these dogs in that position for that purpose .
If these officers would have expended alot of time dealing with these dogs it would have bought the people inside the target house time to arm themselves and detroy evidence vital to putting a dangerous person in jail , serving the purpose they got them for .
I love dogs and do what I can not to harm them but if a dog puts the safety of my fellow officers , civilians or myself at risk then I will do what I have to do to take that dog out of the picture .
Most SWAT teams I know of try to come up with a plan to deal with dogs on high risk wts. without harming them . Most of the time we are successful in dealing with them without harming them . Sometimes we are not and it is very difficult to deal with dogs when the suspects owning them are counting on the Officers dealing with these dogs .
Frank stated;
" The way they shot the dogs, one in the rear and none a clean kill, and let them bleed to death would have made this costly in any state. This was poor planning or over an overamped team. They said the dogs needed to be shot to acheive suprise, but shot them with shotguns from outside the fences, before the fence locks were cut. "
Frank the officers didn't shot the dogs to kill them . They shot the dogs to stop a threat . When the treat(dogs) were stopped they moved on with their task . There's no time to deal any further with the dogs time and speed is important for a safe outcome . Shooting the dogs before dealing with the fence locks seems like common sence to me . Hard to deal with the fence lock with a dog in your face .
Frank , I don't think the SWAT team actually thought they were going to surprise the suspects by stealth but bt SPEED . Like I said these groups are prepared for and expecting the police to eventually come looking for them . Speed was the most important thing and taking out the dogs with a shotgun when they did was the best thing to keep things moving quickly .
You make a very compelling, common sense case. Anyone who thinks that these thug gangster shit-heads deserve a dime because their junk-yard dogs who probably are savoring death over the life they had is an idiot.
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Jim Nash ]
#99036 - 02/24/2006 06:45 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 01-14-2005
Posts: 155
Loc: Beaumont, Texas
Offline |
|
Jim, I am just sick of hearing both plaintiffs and defendant whine about paying to much money or not gettig enough money. If that is the way they feel then try the case or keep their mouth shut and accept the settlement you made. The battle cry about "those crazy juries" does not hold water with me after all these are the same juries we trust to give people the death penalty (at least here in Texas).
Jurys get it right 99% of the time, except of course in those rare cases when I lose in which case they are just flat wrong <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />.
Trent
|
Top
|
Re: Some *Expensive* dogs!!
[Re: Trent Bond ]
#99037 - 02/24/2006 09:54 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 01-25-2003
Posts: 5983
Loc: Idaho
Offline |
|
"Jurys get it right 99% of the time"
WOW!! Usually I have to turn on the Sci-Fi channel to hear fiction like that!
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.