Curtisoms wrote: I personally do not want my dog to just accept handling from the decoy after bite work. I don't believe PSD handlers allow the folks theier dogs just bit to handle and fondle them do they?
***** I want my PSD’s to allow strangers to pet them if I say it’s O.K. But there are many, particularly those with military type trainers, who don’t want anyone touching their dogs at all.
Richard Cannon wrote: My guess with PSD is they are never going to accept an aggitator after a bite. They are used in a different situation. If the PSD has made a bite it was for a reason and the person they just bit will not turn into a "friend". A bad guy is a bad guy by definition, not just a mistaken visitor.
***** I train so that the WILL accept anyone if I say he’s O.K. It makes no difference if he’s just bitten him or not. I want to be the one to make the decision as to who’s a friend and who’s not.
Brendan Powning wrote: If however you are training a personal protection dog then shouldnt its training as closely as possible mirror real life combat?
I cant think of any situation where a rapist, mugger, pedophile, home invader etc. is going to be patting mine or your dog after just being attacked by that same dog. Why then create that situation in training?
***** You’ll find that you’ll meet far more friendly people than muggers, rapists, etc. Having the dog be friendly with the decoy just reminds him that the handler makes the decision as to who is friend or foe. And that decision can change either way at any time.
Vince P. wrote: For a helper to pet a dog after a bite session is crazy. This only confuses a dog in later defense training. I asked Ed once in an email why is this so prevalent and his reaction was that he feels it is a way of a handler showing off and saying, “Look how friendly my dog really is”. A helper should always be neutral off field in sport work. He neither agitates nor praises.
***** I’ve never had a problem with this in training police dogs. As long as the person isn’t a threat or I haven’t given the dog a command to bite him, anyone can pet the dog. I don’t allow it always, but in reality anyone can touch the dog at any time. If you have a dog that won’t permit this or training that doesn’t allow it you’re very limited in what you do.
***** When I was a handler, I used to, and my handlers still do, off leash walk–throughs at shopping malls throughout the city. People, children especially, are always reaching out, without asking first, and touching the dog. Having a dog that is trained to allow this saves many innocent and stupid people from being bitten. Not to mention the lawsuits. Even having a dog on leash won’t stop this. And you can’t stop the stupid people from doing it. I know, I know, I know; there are those who will say that this is just natural selection and that they deserve to be bitten, but the lawyers and courts won’t allow it.
Vince P. wrote: I want my dog to jump into drive as soon as he sees a helper.
***** I’d prefer that my dog was aware of the decoy and wanted to bite him but stayed in control. I’d prefer that he be ready for combat at any time. This doesn’t mean that he walks around constantly loaded up, but that he’s alert and ready.
Vince P. wrote: You NEVER do obedience work when entering or exiting the field. This kills drive.
***** I do OB entering and exiting the field AND in between. I’ll heel the dog within inches of the decoy, in fact, at times brushing the dog against the decoy. Just because someone “bitable” is present doesn’t mean that the dog gets to disregard the fact that I’m still in charge. I think that doing OB builds the drive not kills it. The best way to build a drive is to frustrate it. Look at a dog that watches other dogs biting but is restrained by a “stay” command. Does he want to bite more or does his drive to bite diminish???
Vince P. wrote: Having your dog submit after a training session is just that. You want the dog leaving the feild hungry for more. Next time that SOB is mine. This will confuse the hell out of him when he later has to look at the helper as a fighting partner.
***** I think that perhaps is desirable for a sport dog. But for a PPD or a PSD it’s not as desirable. This, of course, depends on the dog.
***** Anything I’ve written pertains ONLY to a properly selected, trained and handled dog.
New England K-9 - Josh Lewis wrote: Los Angeles County Police K-9 Association.
***** Not to change the direction of this thread but, you fu**in loser, but if you don’t get the name of my Assn., right you won’t be invited back!!! It’s the LACPCA (Los Angeles County Police CANINE Assn.). ROFL.
A now educated Josh Lewis continued: There were about 30 or so teams there from So. Cal and even some from as far as TX and OR. None of the dogs had problems being social after we worked them. Work over, your no problem, why not just be a dog. I trained at LAPD one eve and in the middle of working dogs they got a call. We went to the call and the dogs who were just workin were now right next to me getting ready for deployment. They didn't give me a second look.
***** But that sweet guy in Hollywood sure gave you a couple of second looks!!! LOL (Sorry couldn’t resist).
***** Seriously though folks Josh brings up another point. It’s extremely common if not the “way things are done” in the police world for the decoy to ride in the car with the dog to various training locations during training sessions. If the dog wouldn’t permit this, it would cause problems.
Lou Castle has been kicked off this board. He is an OLD SCHOOL DOG TRAINER with little to offer.