Reg: 10-30-2005
Posts: 4531
Loc: South Dakota, USA
Offline
Quote: mike j schoonbrood
Really??? We're actually worrying about "why" ? Correct the dog and move on. Peeing on my leg is peeing on my leg, I don't care if he thinks he's putting out a fire!
Mike....I totally agree. "Why?" in that type of situation does not really matter....
(off to clean the coffee off my keyboard now.......)
Until The Tale of the Lioness is told, the Story will Always Glorfy the Hunter
LOL My dog marked one once (that was when I just got him)...I still have to watch him around guests. I don't let him around strangers but even the people that I let him around, he still wants to piss on them. Every time I see him start to sniff there leg I have to verbally remind him not to do that.
A tired dog is a good dog, a trained dog is a better dog.
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline
Quote: mike j schoonbrood
Really??? We're actually worrying about "why" ? Correct the dog and move on. Peeing on my leg is peeing on my leg, I don't care if he thinks he's putting out a fire!
Well said!
I have been biting my e-tongue since the O.P., but I can't hold back any longer. Cesar Millan put this very succinctly once:
You know, I didnt think about it in any way other than just another training issue. Not wanting the dog to pee in the ring or on you. Maybe because I was looking at it from what I've done from showing dogs and having a dog only pee when released or on command.
He got me twice and I corrected him the third time he tried (not all on the same night). It's not like I was standing there letting him do this to me and wondering: "hmmm, I wonder why is he peeing on me right now, that's weird?" I'm only wondering "why" because I was curious about the behavior itself (as mentioned earlier about "claiming" and pack structure and all). I understand it was my fault for not correcting it the first (and second) time, he's just so tiny that I didn't notice it or feel it at the time, just later saw a few tinkle marks around my ankle and couldn't correct him for it then (as it was too late for him to make the association). Hopefully, I only needed to make that one correction for him to stop, but I am still paranoid, and again that's why I brought this up.
all i can add is that i hope your "one correction" works. i really truly believe in positive marker training, but, as old as i am, this one would probab--no, absolutely, result in a, what d'ya call it?..."foot in the closest part of the dog"??
not "compulsion" but perhaps "negative reinforcement"??
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.