Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: susan tuck ]
#116662 - 10/31/2006 11:50 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-03-2006
Posts: 1548
Loc: Vermont
Offline |
|
That's a great question; Roger, what experience do you have with ear-cropping? I'm curious.
Steve; I don't know if you've heard of them but the Seth Yacovone band used to have a song about how Bob Barker should be neutered AND spayed <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
Candi, I hear ya. I really, really do <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Roger Blowers ]
#116663 - 10/31/2006 11:54 AM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-03-2006
Posts: 1548
Loc: Vermont
Offline |
|
Oops, it's going so fast my question was answered before I asked it. So....not really any experience with ear-cropping? Interesting. Did you know that docking/dew-claw removal is done WITHOUT anesthesia? But this you're okay with?
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Kristel Smart ]
#116664 - 10/31/2006 11:59 AM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
I'm curious about why the question of a cosmetic surgery has to be compared over and over to surgeries or procedures that are not cosmetic in nature?
Whether or not one thinks highly of neutering, docking, dew-claw removal ........ why is it relevant? It seems like such faulty reasoning. They might each be well worth discussing, but to compare a strictly-cosmetic procedure to any of them seems kind of red-herring-ish.
P.S. It would be enlightening if a discussion of a cosmetic procedure stuck to cosmetic procedures. <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Roger Blowers ]
#116665 - 10/31/2006 12:05 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 01-23-2006
Posts: 1608
Loc: Cali & Wash State
Offline |
|
I think the issue is "is ear cropping cruel"? I do not think this procedure is cruel because the amount of pain the dogs go through is minimal. How do I know that? Well, I happen to know a Trekkie who was really hooked on the Spock character & had his ears done. Yes, I know, I have weird friends! The thing is, to me, neutering dogs is as cruel as cropping ears is to you, unless the dog has a medical condition which requires the surgery. I think if your argument is going to hold up, it should be taken to its logical conclusion & must include other procedures. That being said, I wouldn't label you as a cruel person for neutering your dog. I think we need to take into consideration how much pain the dog is in & what if any, trauma is caused.
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#116666 - 10/31/2006 12:06 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-03-2006
Posts: 1548
Loc: Vermont
Offline |
|
It's not red-herring-ish if the surgical necessity is subjective. What one person feels is critical, another may not. I think the surgical comparisons are more about creating a perspective. HOW horrible is ear-cropping relative to other common surgical procedures? It's not even a blip on the radar, which I think is the point.
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: susan tuck ]
#116667 - 10/31/2006 12:09 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 05-30-2005
Posts: 115
Loc: Costa Blanca, Spain
Offline |
|
Which of us was being patronising?
Roger |
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Kristel Smart ]
#116668 - 10/31/2006 12:12 PM |
Moderator
Reg: 07-13-2005
Posts: 31571
Loc: North-Central coast of California
Offline |
|
It's not red-herring-ish if the surgical necessity is subjective. What one person feels is critical, another may not. I think the surgical comparisons are more about creating a perspective. HOW horrible is ear-cropping relative to other common surgical procedures? It's not even a blip on the radar, which I think is the point.
OK, I get that.
If I draw a line between cosmetic and not, then even procedures that are fought over, debated, and under constant scrutiny, but that have some present-time health reason behind them, will always be on one side of that line in my head, while those done for cosmetic reasons alone will be on the other. Those two sides, for me, don't compare well in a discussion.
But if I have a different line, then this is no longer true.
OK. I do get that. I'm out. I was having a different discussion. <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Connie Sutherland ]
#116669 - 10/31/2006 12:15 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-03-2006
Posts: 1548
Loc: Vermont
Offline |
|
Exactly. And (God help us) everbody has their own line <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />
|
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Roger Blowers ]
#116670 - 10/31/2006 12:30 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 10-19-2006
Posts: 28
Loc:
Offline |
|
I'm glad to see that Roger made his way over to this discussion thread.
Roger, like i had stated in my earlier thread in the "ear cropping" section, ear cropping and docking was only band in England and other European nations in the very late 90's early 00's.
How is it then, that you haven't seen cropped doberman's before, even at shows?
I believe that of the many reasons you "should no more" about ear cropping and the procedure is because of the various sweeping statements you have made regarding the inhumanity of the procedure.
You cannot strongly advocate one position, while disregarding another altogether.
Regards,
Mauricio Vilches |
Top
|
Re: Thoughts On Ear Cropping
[Re: Roger Blowers ]
#116671 - 10/31/2006 12:33 PM |
Webboard User
Reg: 01-23-2006
Posts: 1608
Loc: Cali & Wash State
Offline |
|
Oh you saw that did you? <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.leerburg.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif" alt="" /> After I read it, I changed the whole thing. I took it out, but not soon enough. My bad. You didn't deserve it & the only thing acomplished by it was I made myself look like a jerk. Would you please accept my appology? Isn't it funny how some things push our hot buttons, for no good reason!
|
Top
|
When purchasing any product from Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. it is understood
that any and all products sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. are sold in Dunn
County Wisconsin, USA. Any and all legal action taken against Leerburg Enterprises,
Inc. concerning the purchase or use of these products must take place in Dunn
County, Wisconsin. If customers do not agree with this policy they should not
purchase Leerburg Ent. Inc. products.
Dog Training is never without risk of injury. Do not use any of the products
sold by Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. without consulting a local professional.
The training methods shown in the Leerburg Ent. Inc. DVD’s are meant
to be used with a local instructor or trainer. Leerburg Enterprises, Inc. cannot
be held responsible for accidents or injuries to humans and/or animals.
Copyright 2010 Leerburg® Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. All photos and content on leerburg.com are part of a registered copyright owned by Leerburg Enterprise, Inc.
By accessing any information within Leerburg.com, you agree to abide by the
Leerburg.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.